Similar to the TV show, Who Wants to be a Millionaire? this title invites you into the direction of a great outcome. Here the great outcome is what you will be or become rather than what you will have. Yet, of course, when you become a great problem-solver, you are much more likely to become a millionaire in the process. That’s because when you develop the know-how and the skills for being an effective problem-solver, you will be in high demand.
And that’s because while there are many people who claim to know how to solve problems, and claim that they do solve problems, the actual solving of problems is another story. And this is true of individuals as well as organisations and companies. And it seems to be even more so with cities and countries.
Problems abound — arguments, fights, conflicts, separations, divorces, lawsuits, insults, hatred, prejudice, debt, over-spending, bankruptcy, addictions, financial incompetence, firings, and on and on. And while sometimes even ‘common sense’ knows what needs to be done to solve a problem, the actual solving the problem lags far behind. Sometimes it’s because a person just does not know what to do. Sometimes one knows, but fears taking the course of action to solve the problem. Sometimes one knows and wants to do, but is unskills and incompetent to make it happen.
What does it take to become an Effective Problem-Solver?
To answer that question and empower people to become effective problem-solvers, we have designed a training. It is a training with four stages:
The knowledge about what a Problem truly is. You can’t solve a problem without understanding what constitutes a problem, how it is a problem, how to clearly define a problem, and knowing where the problem is. Many people solve false problems, pseudo-problems and think they are actually solving the real problem. They are solving symptoms and other things, not the real problem.
The Questions for cutting through the noise and mess. Problems are tricky little bastards. When they show up, the presenting problem is almost never the real problem. They show up with lots of noise—distractions, emotions, drama, mis-diagnosis, mis-understandings, gossip, hearsay, etc. An effective problem-solver knows how to ask surgerical questions to cut through the noise and get to “the heart of the matter.”
The Conversations needed for solving problems. Problems arise in language and by language which is why an effective problem-solver starts with a clearly stated problem. He knows that a problem well-formed and defined is half solved already. The conversation a person has in his head, that a board has around a table, that a coach has with a client—that conversation is central to solving the problem. It may be a clarity conversation, a decision conversation, a change conversation, or a conversation on a dozen other subjects.
The multiple dimensions of Solutions resolves the problem. Solutions come in many forms and sizes. What all solutions have in common—they reverse the inadequate thinking of the problem and set out a correct ‘course of action.’ An effective problem-solver knows that the solution is often inside of the problem and so looks there first.
There it is. Four stages: Problem, Questions, Conversations, and Solutions. And those are the four days of training in The 5 Minute Manager—the manager who can facilitate that kind of conversation. We devote time to each of these stages and in doing do, provide all the tools that a person needs to solve a great majority of problems in five minute. Obviously, while not all problems can be solved in five minutes, imagine how much time and energy you could clear up for yourself if you could get many problems resolved that quickly.
Meta-Program #3 — Scope: Global/Specific
Scope: The Detail Trap
Meta-Program #3 — Scope: Global/Specific
The most common diagnosis for a leader who can see the vision but can’t execute it is motivation. They don’t want it badly enough. They’re not disciplined enough. They need a better system, a clearer plan, more accountability.
The diagnosis is almost always wrong.
The gap between vision and execution isn’t usually a motivation problem. It’s a perception problem — specifically, a chunk size problem. The leader isn’t failing to act because they don’t care. They’re failing to act because their thinking naturally operates at an altitude where the next concrete step isn’t visible.
Perceptual filtering
This is the Scope meta-program. Global thinkers process information at the level of concepts, patterns, and big pictures. Specific thinkers process at the level of steps, sequences, and details. Both are valid. Both are necessary. The problem emerges when a leader’s natural chunk size is mismatched to the task in front of them — and nobody knows that’s what’s happening.
Global Preference
The global end of the spectrum deserves the most attention here, because it’s where the gap between insight and action most often lives. A global thinker can hold extraordinary complexity at the conceptual level. They see connections, possibilities, and directions that specific thinkers miss entirely. But asked to translate that into a concrete action plan, they produce either beautiful abstractions or a frustrated silence. Not because the thinking isn’t there. Because their perceptual filter doesn’t naturally zoom in to the level where action happens.
Take a strategic planning session as an example. The global thinker generates the vision in the first twenty minutes and is ready to move. The specific thinker is still asking about milestones. The global thinker experiences this as obstruction. The specific thinker experiences the global thinker as reckless. Both are right about what they’re seeing. Neither is seeing the whole picture.
When you can identify someone’s natural chunk size, you stop trying to motivate them differently and start working with their perceptual architecture. You give the global thinker a specific thinker as a thinking partner, not a critic. You ask the specific thinker for the map before you ask for the territory.
The vision was never the problem. It was always the altitude.
Are you looking to develop skills in relating?
To Coach Precisely, Think Precisely
Most coaches who want to improve their precision go looking for better questions. Better frameworks. Better tools. They study the Meta-Model, memorise the distinctions, and practice until they can recite all 21 questions without thinking.
And they’re still not precise.
They’ve misdiagnosed the problem.
Better tools don’t produce precision. They assume it.
Here’s what’s actually going on. Language is sloppy by design. Look up any everyday word in the dictionary and you’ll find seven to thirty different definitions. When a client uses a word like “frustrated” or “committed” or “success,” you genuinely don’t know which definition they mean, and neither do they. The words themselves don’t contain the meaning. The meaning lives in the thinking underneath the words, and if that thinking is fuzzy, no amount of questioning will make the language precise. You’ll just produce more language.
Think about what to work on
This means there are two completely different things a coach can work on: cleaning up language, or cleaning up thinking. Most coaches work on language. The ones who produce real change work on thinking.
The Meta-Model gives you tools for language. It surfaces what’s been deleted, distorted, or over-generalised. That’s valuable. But those tools only do their job when the person wielding them is already thinking precisely. Without that, you’re asking questions, not producing clarity.
Precise thinking is its own skill, and it runs deeper than any questioning framework. There are five movements at its core: considering, questioning, doubting, detailing, and distinguishing.
They sound simple. They aren’t.
First Consider
Take the first one, considering. Not agreeing. Not disagreeing. Genuinely holding an idea and turning it over. Most people, and most clients, don’t do this. They hear an idea, categorise it instantly as familiar or threatening, and move on. Real considering means staying with an idea long enough to actually see it. That alone requires more mental discipline than most people have ever been trained for.
When you can lead a client into genuine consideration, before a single Meta-Model question is asked, you’ve already done something most coaches can’t do.
Think clearly create the quality of questioning
Then comes the quality of questioning, not more questions but better ones, questions that go to the core of an idea rather than around its edges. Then productive doubt, the rigorous testing of an idea at its foundations, not cynicism but precision. Then detailing, which forces vague claims into specific, falsifiable ones. And distinguishing, which separates things that have been fused together and treated as one when they aren’t.
These five movements are what separate a coach who generates good conversation from a coach who produces actual change.
Think Precisely, take criticism as an example.
A client says: “I struggle with criticism.” The imprecise coach hears a problem and moves to solutions. The precise coach pauses. Considers. What kind of criticism? From whom? Struggle how, avoidance, defensiveness, paralysis? Is it the receiving of criticism that’s the problem, or the internal meaning they’ve made of it? Has the client ever distinguished between criticism of their work and criticism of their worth?
Without the thinking skills to ask those questions, even a well-trained Meta-Model practitioner is working on the surface of the problem. Find out more here
Think this is what can be different for you now.
Before you reach for a question, notice the quality of your own thinking in that moment. Are you genuinely considering what the client just said, or categorising it? Are you probing at the core, or running a questioning routine? Are you distinguishing between two things that sound similar but aren’t?
Precision Strategy
The tools don’t make you precise. Precise thinking makes you precise, and then the tools do exactly what they’re designed to do.
That’s the pathway. Not more techniques. Sharper thinking first.
Are you looking to develop skills in clear thinking? Contact The Coaching Centre
var gform;gform||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,function(){gform.scriptsLoaded=!0}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,function(){gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,function(){gform.domLoaded=!0}),gform={domLoaded:!1,scriptsLoaded:!1,themeScriptsLoaded:!1,isFormEditor:()=>”function”==typeof InitializeEditor,callIfLoaded:function(o){return!(!gform.domLoaded||!gform.scriptsLoaded||!gform.themeScriptsLoaded&&!gform.isFormEditor()||(gform.isFormEditor()&&console.warn(“The use of gform.initializeOnLoaded() is deprecated in the form editor context and will be removed in Gravity Forms 3.1.”),o(),0))},initializeOnLoaded:function(o){gform.callIfLoaded(o)||(document.addEventListener(“gform_main_scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.scriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),document.addEventListener(“gform/theme/scripts_loaded”,()=>{gform.themeScriptsLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}),window.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,()=>{gform.domLoaded=!0,gform.callIfLoaded(o)}))},hooks:{action:{},filter:{}},addAction:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“action”,o,r,e,t)},addFilter:function(o,r,e,t){gform.addHook(“filter”,o,r,e,t)},doAction:function(o){gform.doHook(“action”,o,arguments)},applyFilters:function(o){return gform.doHook(“filter”,o,arguments)},removeAction:function(o,r){gform.removeHook(“action”,o,r)},removeFilter:function(o,r,e){gform.removeHook(“filter”,o,r,e)},addHook:function(o,r,e,t,n){null==gform.hooks[o][r]&&(gform.hooks[o][r]=[]);var d=gform.hooks[o][r];null==n&&(n=r+”_”+d.length),gform.hooks[o][r].push({tag:n,callable:e,priority:t=null==t?10:t})},doHook:function(r,o,e){var t;if(e=Array.prototype.slice.call(e,1),null!=gform.hooks[r][o]&&((o=gform.hooks[r][o]).sort(function(o,r){return o.priority-r.priority}),o.forEach(function(o){“function”!=typeof(t=o.callable)&&(t=window[t]),”action”==r?t.apply(null,e):e[0]=t.apply(null,e)})),”filter”==r)return e[0]},removeHook:function(o,r,t,n){var e;null!=gform.hooks[o][r]&&(e=(e=gform.hooks[o][r]).filter(function(o,r,e){return!!(null!=n&&n!=o.tag||null!=t&&t!=o.priority)}),gform.hooks[o][r]=e)}});
Personal Coaching
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FREE GUIDE: The Brand New Way To Gain Self Confidence And Never Lose It
This field is hidden when viewing the form
document.getElementById( “ak_js_1” ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );
THE SECRET TO EFFECTIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING
Problem Solving Secrets
By Dr.L.Michael Hall and Shawn Dwyer
Many people think that the art of solving problems means being creative or intelligent or lucky. Actually and amazingly, it is none of these. So what is it? Experts in problem-solving are effective because they know how to ask critical questions. They know how to cut through all of the noise and mess that comes with problems and which can distract and/or overwhelm us.
The secret of effective problem-solving is not being ingenious enough to invent some new solution. It is not even that! The secret is rather in the art of questioning. For instance, with any and every problem, the first critical question should be, “Has anyone on Planet Earth ever had a problem like this before and, if so, did they solved it?” If so, you don’t need to create an entirely new solution. Isn’t that great? You just need to find out what has already proven effective. After all, why spend the time, energy, and money to reinvent a solution which is already available?
The Next Critical Question
Is the problem an internal problem or an external problem? Asking this question distinguishes personal problems from impersonal problems. External problems are impersonal because they are functions of physics, gravity, chemistry, forces, mechanics, processes, tools, etc. Here know-how and the right tools are key. Additional external factors also play into the solution: time, personnel, money, purpose, etc. Here also the bigger the external problem (which is a condition or situation in the world), it will require more people to solve it. That means the solution will be a collaborative effort of a group, organisation, industry, government, etc.
If it is an Internal Problem (and therefore personal)
It is a function of meaning—of ideas, concepts, beliefs, understandings, etc. And whereas the concept of causation works perfectly well with external conditions and situations, the idea of ‘cause’ on the inside is entirely psychological. It is about how one is thinking, remembering, imagining, believing, etc. That requires an entirely different skill-set.
An External Problem
by definition, is something that is “thrown in your path” that blocks and interferes (Greek: pro-blemo, to throw). It could be a faulty mechanism, the wrong timing, mis-coordination, lack of a key resource, lack of political will—all sorts of interferences. Solving the problem then focuses on addressing the blockage and resolving it. That’s why know-how as good thinking is central to external problems.
For internal problems, the thing that blocks and interferes is some kind of an inadequate thinking —a belief, memory, rule, perception, way of thinking, etc. The block lies in the person’s mind. Perhaps the person doesn’t have the know-how, or a good strategy for being resilient, persistent, assertive, competent, etc. Perhaps the person has limiting beliefs which block him. Perhaps she has limiting decisions, understandings, etc. Solving personal problems focuses on changing the thinking that’s creating the problem. It means framing or reframing things in a different way to get a better perspective and attitude.
Psycho-logical
Now because internal problems are psychological, we can say that they are psycho-logical (this follows what Korzybski introduced in Science and Sanity). That is, ‘logical’ to the way the person’s mind (psyche) thinks about something.
Take criticism as an example. How do you think about someone criticising you? In your thinking, do you personalise the criticism? Do you awfulise it? Do you think, “This will forever cast a dark shadow on my future?” Your thinking here describes your psycho-logics—your internal way of constructing meaning, and as you so think, so you feel, perceive, and act. This describes how you internally ‘cause’ or create your psychological reality. It’s how you construct your problems.
Awareness is Curative
And, knowing this is the secret to managing it! It’s with awareness of how you construct your meanings that you can stop one constructing process and begin constructing another. It’s in your power to do that. And the more you do this, the greater grows your capacity for creating your internal psycho-logics so they serve you well. Problems are created inside–out and problems are solved inside–out. That’s why in the problem-solving process, we do the meta probe with ourselves and others. That is, we have to go inside the mind. That’s where the problem was generated in the first place, that is where it will finally be resolved.
Are you looking to develop skills in problem solving? Contact The Coaching Centre
Personal Coaching
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FREE GUIDE: The Brand New Way To Gain Self Confidence And Never Lose It
This field is hidden when viewing the form
document.getElementById( “ak_js_2” ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );
Thriving on Problems
Thriving on Problems
Now talk about a wild and crazy idea! Thriving on problems?! Really? Well, yes, that’s the vision of developing expertise in problem-solving. When you get really good at solving problems, you will naturally delight in problems. You will take them on as the grist for your mill. You know that within them is gold to mine. This means that problems do not have to stop you or depress you, once you turn your thinking around and enhance your skill level, you can actually thrive in their presence. How about that?
To turn around your thinking, whenever you hear the world ‘problem,’ think puzzle. And don’t you love puzzles? Crossword puzzles, language riddles, mystery puzzles, puzzles which are set up in games, on the internet, on TV game shows. Who has a problem with a puzzle? Hardly anyone. Puzzles tease the mind; they are playful. They are fun. They start by mystifying us. At first we are confused, unsure, perplexed, bewildered, but as we then ponder the puzzle and ‘puzzle it out,’ we figure it out which becomes an ecstatic moment of delight.
Here’s my reframe
Problems are puzzles for my mind. As such problems can activate your mind and your creativity. With problems, you can unleash potentials you didn’t even know you had, and develop creative thinking skills that can lead to innovative breakthroughs. But, and this is a big but, all this requires that you adopt a robust attitude and develop your problem-solving skills. Only then can you move into becoming an effective and creative problem-solver.
Now the people who thrive on problems tend to be the entrepreneurs of the future. They see a problem—something that gets in the way or something that’s missing which is needed—and they set about to solve the problem. These are the people who actually search for problems to solve and embrace the problems they find. They know that ‘the bigger the problem, the more the money’ (another great reframe). That’s because people will pay for solutions to their problems. And that in a few words is the secret for wealth creation.
The Pace of Problem Solving
To thrive on problems, slow yourself down when you come upon a problem. Take time to precisely define the problem. Like any puzzle, most problems arrive at our door step vague, ambiguous, and messy. That’s why we have to take time to clean up the ‘problem’ linguistically and conceptually. To rashly jump in and try to solve the problem typically leads you to solving the wrong problem or inadequately solving it. Those who thrive on problems know that “the presenting problem” is usually not the real problem.
The danger of rushing into problem-solving is that when you solve a symptom rather than the problem, the problem will return. That’s because you never got to the actual problem, just symptoms and expressions of it. You didn’t go deep enough into the thinking of the core construct.
Those who thrive on problems have another secret, they fully embrace the problem by entering into it to understand it from the inside–out. Abraham Maslow, who was recognized as an authority on creativity in the 1950s and 60s, described this.
“The best way to view a present problem is to give it all you’ve got, to study it, and its nature, to perceive within it the intrinsic interrelationships, to discover (rather than to invent) the answer to the problem within the problem itself.” (p. 61)
That last line is a jewel: “discover the answer to the problem within the problem itself.” How about that? What if by entering into the problem, clearly defining it, and understanding its internal structures implies and reveals the solution? If so, then like a good puzzle, there’s this paradox to problem-solving, you first have to embrace the problem in order to make the meta probe journey into the center of the meanings that encode the problem. That is, the solution is inside of the problem.
That explains one of the key questions we use in the problem-solving process, “If this statement described the problem and you turn it into a question—a question that elicits an answer that solves the problem, what is the question?
Are you looking to develop skills in problem solving? Contact The Coaching Centre
Personal Coaching
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FREE GUIDE: The Brand New Way To Gain Self Confidence And Never Lose It
This field is hidden when viewing the form
document.getElementById( “ak_js_3” ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );
The Invisible Principles That Govern Problem-Solving
The Invisible Principles That Govern Problem-Solving
Every discipline operates according to principles. Coaching has its principles. Training has its principles. Wealth creation, selling, persuasion—each governed by fundamental laws that determine success or failure. Yet for most people, these principles remain invisible. They function without awareness of the underlying frameworks, and this creates a significant problem. Without knowing the guiding principles, you lack the foundational understanding needed to develop genuine competency. Problem-solving is no exception. If you don’t understand the core principles that govern how problems work and how they resolve, you’re destined to make predictable mistakes. You’ll struggle with the same issues repeatedly, never developing the systematic approach that separates those who cope from those who create breakthrough solutions.
Here’s the deeper pattern: to become competent in any field, you must first make the governing principles conscious. With practice, they become automatic. But you cannot start with unconsciousness. You must first understand what you’re doing before you can do it without thinking.
What Most People Miss About Problems
Most people approach problems with a fundamental misunderstanding. They treat problems as external obstacles—things happening “out there” that need to be removed. This perspective limits effectiveness because it misses the essential truth that Einstein captured: the kind of thinking that creates a problem cannot solve it.
Problems don’t exist beyond your skin. Every problem is fundamentally a mental phenomenon—a flawed understanding, a distorted meaning, a false interpretation. The presenting problem you’re experiencing is rarely the actual problem. It’s a symptom of problematic thinking at deeper levels.
Consider someone who repeatedly struggles with procrastination. The surface issue appears to be poor time management. But the actual problem typically involves thinking patterns around perfectionism or fear of failure. Until you address the thinking creating the procrastination, no productivity hack will create lasting change.
You Unconscious Filters Shape Everything
Your unconscious mental filters—what we call meta-programs—determine how you perceive problems before you’re even aware you’re doing it. These filters operate automatically, shaping whether you see problems as threats or opportunities, whether you focus on what’s wrong or what’s possible.
Some people default to pessimistic framing, automatically scanning for worst-case scenarios and potential failures. This creates vigilance but often leads to paralysis. Others naturally focus on best-case possibilities and available resources. This builds momentum but can lead to underestimating real obstacles.
Your filters also determine whether you look for sameness or difference in problems. Those who match patterns struggle to identify what’s unique about each situation, often applying old solutions to new problems. Those who focus on differences may overcomplicate straightforward issues.
Most significantly, your filters shape where you locate the source of problems. Some people see problems as created by circumstances or other people. This makes ownership difficult because you can’t control what’s outside you. Others recognize their role in creating problems through their responses. This enables agency but can lead to excessive self-blame.
When you’re unaware of these patterns, they limit your effectiveness. When you develop conscious awareness of how you’re filtering, you gain the ability to choose more useful perspectives.
The Progression From Problem-Solving Dysfunction To Mastery
Like any human capacity, problem-solving ability exists on a spectrum. Most people operate in the middle levels without realizing higher levels exist.
At dysfunctional levels, you exhibit immediate emotional reactivity when problems surface. You blame others automatically, solve the same problems repeatedly without learning, and avoid difficult situations. You jump to solutions before understanding the problem and experience problems as personal failures.
At functional levels, you pause to understand before acting. You ask questions to clarify the real issue, own your contribution, and adapt your approach when initial attempts fail. You distinguish symptoms from root causes and view problems as solvable challenges.
At mastery levels, you reframe problems to reveal hidden opportunities. You identify systemic patterns others miss, maintain emotional equilibrium while problem-solving, and generate multiple solution paths simultaneously. You recognise when “problems” serve useful functions and use them as catalysts for innovation.
What Separates Limiting Thinking From Mastery
Those with limiting beliefs think problems shouldn’t exist or that good planning prevents all problems. Mastery recognizes that problems are inevitable features of complex systems. They provide essential feedback. The goal isn’t eliminating problems but developing increasingly sophisticated ways of engaging with them.
Limited thinking assumes the problem is what it appears to be. Mastery understands that the presenting problem is usually a symptom of deeper thinking patterns. Real problem-solving requires probing beneath surface manifestations.
Those operating from limitation believe they need more information before they can solve anything. While information helps, excessive analysis often masks fear of decision-making. Mastery balances analysis with action, learning through iteration.
Limited thinkers struggle with ownership, either taking on problems that aren’t theirs or avoiding ones that are. Mastery involves discerning what’s your responsibility while avoiding both over-functioning and under-functioning.
Those with limiting frames search for single causes and single solutions. Mastery recognizes that significant problems involve multiple factors interacting systemically. They require multi-level interventions, not silver bullets.
The Practical Way Forward
Understanding these principles means nothing without application. Here’s how to begin developing genuine problem-solving mastery. Start with acceptance, not resistance. You can’t solve a problem you’re denying exists. Full acceptance doesn’t mean liking the problem—it means seeing it clearly without the distortion that resistance creates. Enter into the problem completely. Probe for the real problem. Challenge your initial formulation. Ask: “What problem is this problem a symptom of?” The problem as stated is rarely the actual problem. The real problem often hides at deeper levels of your mental processing. Clarify ownership. Who actually owns this problem? For whom is this a genuine problem, and for whom isn’t it? You can’t solve problems belonging to others. Attempting to solve problems that aren’t yours creates dependency and resentment. Decompose the elements. Break the problem into component pieces. Often a solution lies hidden in those pieces. As you identify components, consider how they might work differently for a new construction. The problem contains the seeds of its own solution. Clean up the language. Problems are coded in words. Sometimes problems exist solely because of imprecise language. Test the accuracy of your words. Does “always” really mean always? Does “never” actually mean never? Is “can’t” literally true, or does it mean “haven’t figured out how yet”? Infer hidden assumptions. What has to be true for this problem to exist? Your problem formulation contains implicit assumptions. Making them explicit often reveals why the problem persists. The assumption itself may be the problem. Respect the problem’s positive function. What useful purpose might this problem serve? Most “problems” are failed solutions to something. The procrastination protects you from failure. The conflict maintains distance. Understanding the positive function opens paths to meeting the underlying need more effectively. Shift to a lighter frame when stuck. Maslow wrote that one way to solve a problem is to be amused by it. When you’re grinding away with grim determination, humor often provides the perspective shift that enables breakthrough. This isn’t avoiding the issue—it’s accessing different mental resources.
From Understanding To Embodiment
Developing problem-solving mastery isn’t a linear process. You won’t progress smoothly from dysfunction through to mastery. Instead, you’ll operate at different levels depending on the domain, your state, and the problem type. The goal is expanding your range and raising your baseline.
Start by making your current problem-solving patterns conscious. Notice how you automatically respond when problems arise. Identify which filters you default to. Recognize your habitual moves. This awareness doesn’t require changing anything initially—just seeing what’s actually happening.
Next, practice applying the core principles deliberately. When facing a problem, consciously work through acceptance, ownership, decomposition, and reframing. Yes, this feels awkward at first. That’s normal. You’re building new neural pathways. With repetition, these principles become automatic.
Then expand your filter range. If you default to pessimism, practice finding the optimistic frame. If you’re primarily focused on internal causation, explore the systemic perspective. Flexibility comes from developing multiple ways of processing, not eliminating your natural patterns.
Finally, recognise that problem-solving mastery serves something larger than just fixing what’s broken. It’s about developing the mental agility and emotional resilience to navigate complexity with wisdom. It’s about becoming the kind of person who welcomes challenges as opportunities to grow rather than threats to avoid.
The principles are clear. The pathway is available. Your problem-solving capacity is not fixed—it’s developable. The question is whether you’ll make the invisible visible, bring consciousness to what’s been automatic, and commit to the deliberate practice that transforms understanding into embodied skill.
The problems you face today are inviting you to develop capabilities you don’t yet possess. That’s not a burden. That’s how mastery works.
Are you looking to develop skills in problem solving? Contact The Coaching Centre
Personal Coaching
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FREE GUIDE: The Brand New Way To Gain Self Confidence And Never Lose It
This field is hidden when viewing the form
document.getElementById( “ak_js_4” ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );
Why You Resist Exercise: The Hidden Patterns Sabotaging Your Consistency
Why You Resist Exercise: The Hidden Patterns Sabotaging Your Consistency
My client Sarah knows what to do. She understands that three resistance sessions weekly would transform her energy and health. She still hasn’t exercised consistently for more than six weeks in five years.
The problem isn’t knowledge. It’s invisible mental patterns that guarantee failure.
Exercise resistance isn’t about laziness. It’s about mismatched mental frameworks operating beneath awareness.
The Perfectionism Trap
Watch someone set an exercise goal. Their entire approach to striving reveals itself instantly.
Consider clients who launch programs with all-or-nothing thinking. They commit to training six days weekly, eating perfectly, transforming their bodies in twelve weeks. This sounds like motivation. It’s self-sabotage disguised as ambition.
Notice the pattern: set unrealistic standards, fail when life interferes, interpret failure as proof you can’t succeed, abandon everything. The bar sits so high that anything less than perfection feels like defeat.
Optimize instead of perfecting. Commit to three sessions weekly and celebrate hitting that target. Measure success by consistency over time, not intensity in any single week.
One client transformed her relationship with exercise by shifting one distinction. Instead of “I must train perfectly,” she adopted “I will show up.” Some days meant full sessions. Other days meant fifteen minutes. Both built the pattern.
Sustainable excellence emerges from consistent adequate effort, not sporadic perfect performance.
The External Reference Problem
Some people sustain exercise only with external accountability. A trainer. A partner. A race. Without external structure, their motivation evaporates.
Listen to the language: “My trainer says…” “Everyone at the gym is…” “The app told me…” No “I” drives the process. You’ve outsourced your exercise authority entirely.
External reference becomes problematic when you cannot sustain exercise without it. When the structure disappears, so does your practice.
Consider the man who hired trainers for fifteen years. He never exercised independently. He knew plenty about exercise. He lacked trust in his own judgment.
Use external resources. Don’t depend on external validation. One empowers. The other enslaves.
The All-or-Nothing Timeline
Most people focus entirely on this week’s training with no connection to months ahead.
Recognize the pattern: train intensely for four weeks, miss three sessions when life disrupts routine, decide you’ve failed, quit entirely. Three months later, start again.
Shift the distinction: short-term performance versus long-term practice. Short-term thinking asks “Did I train perfectly this week?” Long-term thinking asks “Am I building a sustainable pattern?”
Every consistently fit person thinks in long timelines. They know this week’s missed workout means nothing in five years of training.
Consider the client who adopted a five-year perspective. Instead of panicking when work disrupted his routine, he asked “Will this week matter in five years?” Usually no. This freed him to skip sessions without guilt and resume without shame.
Focus on the long timeline. It improves short-term consistency.
The Deficiency Drive
Pay attention to why people exercise. Many run from something rather than toward something. “I need to burn off these calories.” “I must punish myself for being lazy.”
Deficiency-based motivation creates toxic relationships with movement. Exercise becomes penance. Your body becomes an enemy to control rather than a partner to strengthen.
Fear and shame exhaust. Eventually, deficiency motivation collapses.
Choose being-based motivation instead. Exercise because you value strength, capability, vitality. Move because it makes you feel alive. Train toward something you want, not away from something you fear.
Watch clients transform their consistency by shifting their motivational frame. Instead of “I need to lose weight,” they adopt “I’m building strength.” The first creates dread. The second generates enthusiasm.
Treat exercise as punishment and you’ll resist it. Treat it as empowerment and you’ll pursue it.
The State-Dependent Pattern
Some people exercise only when they feel motivated. They wait for inspiration, for energy, for the perfect mood. States fluctuate wildly.
Notice the pattern: “I’ll exercise when I feel like it.” “I wasn’t in the mood.” You’ve made exercise dependent on a state you can’t control.
Understand something crucial: you don’t wait for the right state to exercise. You exercise and the state follows. Motivation comes after you start moving.
Consider the client who insisted she could only train when energetic. We ran an experiment. She committed to starting regardless of state but could stop after five minutes. In three months, she never stopped. The state shifted once she began moving.
Create states through action rather than waiting for states to permit action.
The Identity Void
Listen to how people describe themselves. “I’m not an exercise person.” “I’m not athletic.” This language reveals identity.
Recognize the pattern: if your identity excludes exercise, consistency becomes nearly impossible. You fight your own self-concept every time you train.
Consider the woman who repeatedly lost forty pounds then regained it. Being “the big girl” was central to her identity. Becoming fit meant threatening relationships she’d held for decades.
Work on identity evolution, not just exercise programming. Force behavior change temporarily through willpower. Achieve sustained transformation through identity shift.
Become someone for whom exercise is natural.
The Integration
Notice your patterns. Do you set impossible standards? Reference externally? Think only short-term? Exercise from deficiency? Wait for the right state? Carry a non-exercise identity?
Address each pattern systematically. Shift from perfection to optimization. Build internal reference. Adopt five-year thinking. Exercise toward capability. Create states through action. Evolve your identity to include exercise.
Change the patterns. The behaviour follows.
Want to find out more? Grab our FREE personal coaching brochure below
Personal Coaching
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FREE GUIDE: The Brand New Way To Gain Self Confidence And Never Lose It
This field is hidden when viewing the form
document.getElementById( “ak_js_5” ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );
THE MIRROR AND THE LAMP: FINDING YOUR TRUE SELF
THE MIRROR AND THE LAMP: FINDING YOUR TRUE SELF
Shawn Dwyer
November 23, 2025
What if the greatest struggle of your life isn’t between you and the world, but between two versions of yourself?
I’ve spent years observing this tension in my work with people across different contexts—in training rooms, coaching sessions, and organizational transformations. What strikes me most is how we’re all caught between two powerful forces: the need to belong and the need to be ourselves. We want to fit in, yet we desperately want to stand out. We mirror our tribe, yet we long to light our own lamp.
Gordon Allport called this the fundamental dilemma of becoming—the process by which an unsocialized infant transforms into a unique adult with structured loves, loyalties, and interests. I’ve come to believe this framework explains much of the confusion and conflict I see in myself and others.
The Unsocialised Beginning
Here’s an uncomfortable truth: measured by adult standards, a two-year-old is an “unsocialized horror.” Imagine an adult who destroys property without hesitation, demands instant gratification, cannot share possessions, and explodes in violent tantrums. We’d call that person monstrous. Yet in a toddler, it’s perfectly normal.
This reveals something profound about human development. We don’t arrive pre-programmed for society. Unlike other animals who live by instinct and repeat the patterns of their species with minor variation, we humans must transform ourselves. We begin as purely reactive creatures focused on immediate gratification, and somehow—through a process we barely understand—we become adults capable of long-range goals, self-sacrifice, and choosing our own life path.
The question that haunts psychology is: How does this transformation actually happen?
The Tribal Mirror
The first force shaping us is tribal. From birth, we depend entirely on others for survival. Our security, gratification, and earliest lessons all come from outside ourselves—from parents, family, culture. We learn when to eat, what to fear, how to behave. We’re coerced and cajoled into conformity.
This creates what Allport calls the “mirror” aspect of personality. We reflect our tribe. Our moral sense begins as a copy of family and community standards. Our early self-concept is simply how others see us reflected back.
I see this mirroring everywhere in organizational life. New employees unconsciously adopt the communication patterns, dress codes, and unwritten rules of their workplace. Teams develop shared vocabularies and inside jokes. We become, in many ways, products of our environment.
There’s wisdom in this. The tribal mirror provides the security and belonging we need to function. Without successfully navigating this stage, we remain trapped in reactive protest—always demanding, jealous, insecure. Research on early childhood consistently shows that affectional deprivation creates adults who never quite recover, who spend their lives seeking the security they missed.
The Individual Lamp
But here’s what makes humans unique: from the very beginning, we resist. Even infants show negativistic behavior—crying, rejecting, asserting themselves against the smothering effects of their environment. It’s as if we instinctively recognize that pure conformity threatens something essential within us.
This is the “lamp” of individuality. While one force makes us tribal mirrors, another force demands autonomy, uniqueness, self-determination. We don’t just want to survive and fit in; we want to become something distinctive. We want our own style, our own values, our own vision.
I’ve watched this play out countless times in leadership development. People rise through organizations by mastering the mirror—reflecting back what their culture rewards. Then, often in mid-career, they hit a crisis. They realize they’ve become so good at mirroring that they’ve lost touch with their own lamp. They don’t know what they truly value, separate from what they’ve been taught to value.
The Lifelong Reconciliation
Allport argues that all our lives we’re attempting to reconcile these two modes of becoming. We cannot eliminate either one. Pure tribalism makes us slavish conformists with no authentic self. Pure individualism disconnects us from the very relationships and structures we need to develop fully.
The mature person doesn’t choose one over the other. Instead, they engage in what I’d call “conscious mirroring”—they adopt tribal standards selectively, reshaping and transcending them. Their moral sense reaches beyond mere convention. They obey social norms but know these are somewhat peripheral to their personal integrity.
This is the essence of growing up: moving from unconscious reaction to conscious choice. The child mirrors automatically and rebels instinctively. The adult mirrors strategically and individuates intentionally.
What This Means for You
If you’re feeling stuck or conflicted, ask yourself: Which force am I neglecting?
Have you become so focused on fitting in, pleasing others, and meeting external expectations that your individual lamp has dimmed? Do you even know what you genuinely value anymore, separate from what you’ve been conditioned to value?
Or conversely, are you so committed to being different and autonomous that you’ve rejected the wisdom embedded in your traditions? Have you cut yourself off from the affiliative bonds that actually enable growth?
The path forward isn’t to eliminate tension between mirror and lamp—it’s to make that tension conscious and productive. Your becoming depends on successfully negotiating both forces throughout your life.
You’ll always be part mirror, reflecting your time, place, and tribe. But you’ll also be part lamp, illuminating something that only you can bring into the world. The question is whether you’re doing both consciously or letting one force dominate by default.
Your most authentic self emerges not by choosing between belonging and individuality, but by mastering the art of reconciling them.
What aspect of your life most clearly shows you’re still just mirroring others? And where is your individual lamp burning brightest?
Want to find out more? Grab our FREE personal coaching brochure below
Personal Coaching
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
FREE GUIDE: The Brand New Way To Gain Self Confidence And Never Lose It
This field is hidden when viewing the form
document.getElementById( “ak_js_6” ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );
Breaking Free From Limiting Beliefs
Breaking Free From Limiting Beliefs
Have you ever noticed how your mind creates stories about everything? You see your boss frown, and instantly you’re convinced you’re about to be fired. Someone doesn’t text back, and you’ve written an entire narrative about what that means. This isn’t just casual thinking—it’s belief-building, and it shapes everything in your life.
Two Levels of Thinking
I’ve learned something recently that changed how I understand my own mind. When you first experience something—seeing, hearing, feeling—your thinking is direct and immediate. You’re simply tracking what’s happening, creating a mental movie of your experience. This first-level thinking is straightforward and natural. You can’t really hurt yourself with it.
But then comes the second level. After you create that mental movie, you draw conclusions about it. You like it or you don’t. You decide it’s good or bad, valid or invalid. This is your self-reflexive consciousness at work—your unique ability as a human being to think about your thinking. It’s both your glory and your agony.
The Power of Beliefs
Every conclusion you draw becomes a belief. You create beliefs about everything: what things are (identity), how they work (cause and effect), what they mean in your life (value), where they came from (history), and what you should do about them (purpose). Here’s what matters: you cannot not believe. The moment you think about your experience, you’ve moved to this meta-level, building an inner world of beliefs that define you.
Think about any area of your life—work, relationships, money, health. You’ve got beliefs about all of it. Some energize you and make life enjoyable. Others hold you back, create inner conflict, and disempower you. Everything in your mind beyond that initial movie is a belief. Your values, memories, expectations, identity, decisions—all beliefs of different kinds.
Your Personal Epistemology
When you believe something, you’re building your own “model of the world”—your map for navigating reality. Whatever you believe becomes your epistemology, your way of knowing and understanding. If you believe people are essentially untrustworthy, that’s your epistemology. If you believe you’ll never succeed, that’s your epistemology too. Your beliefs don’t just describe reality—they create it. They operate as self-fulfilling prophecies.
This is why most people stay stuck. They need to escape the kind of thinking that created their limitations, but when they try, they use that same limited thinking. They’re trapped in a loop with no exit.
Breaking the Loop
So how do you escape your own thinking? How do you gain freedom from limiting beliefs?
You need to re-think. Only by examining your original limiting belief from a fresh perspective can you establish new, empowering beliefs. You have to claim—probably for the first time—your self-reflexive consciousness. You need to engage in meta-thinking, thinking about your thinking, so you can actually take charge of it.
Here’s a practical approach: Start with your mental movie. Intentionally step back from your conclusions about it. Just observe as a witness—see and see, hear and hear, feel and feel. Now bring curiosity to it. Bring playfulness, acceptance, a learning mindset. When you do this, you’re applying a higher-level frame to your original thought. You’re genuinely re-thinking rather than recycling old patterns.
This lets you run an ecology check on your thinking. You begin to take real control of your mind. And when you do, you discover what genuine mental freedom feels like.
IS NLP STILL RELEVANT IN 2026
IS NLP STILL RELEVANT IN 2025/2026?
The Coaching Centre – Australia
info@thecoachingcentre.com.au Have you ever wondered why some professional development models fade into obscurity while others continue to evolve?
I’ve been wrestling with this question lately as I watch the coaching landscape shift beneath our feet.
Last month, a colleague asked me point-blank: “Should I still invest time learning NLP?” I paused. Not because I doubted the answer, but because the question itself revealed a deeper confusion about what NLP actually is today.
The Identity Crisis
Here’s what most people don’t realise: NLP isn’t one thing. It never was.
When someone says they “know NLP,” I need to ask when they learned it and from whom. A practitioner trained in 1978 experienced something fundamentally different from someone certified in 1995, and both learned a different model than what we’re teaching in 2025.
Think of it this way. In 1972, before the term NLP even existed, a group of college students gathered on the Kresge campus at UC Santa Cruz. They called themselves “the Meta People.” They weren’t learning a codified system with levels and certifications. They were practicing sensory awareness, asking how instead of why, and learning to stay present rather than getting lost in mental chatter.
That was NLP’s origin story. Not slick marketing or certification hierarchies, but raw experiential learning drawn from Fritz Perls’ Gestalt Therapy work.
From the Gestalt book that Richard Bandler edited from Perls, the following comprised much of Perl’s focus:
Come into the here-and-now, be present.
Realize that all problems exist in the here-and-now.
Get out of your chattering head and see-and-see, hear-and-hear.
Learn to come into sensory-awareness; stop hallucinating.
Stop the chattering and clutter in your mind.
Stop asking why and learn to ask how.
Stop introjecting large chunk of generalisations.
Break introjects down into pieces.
Refuse the Either/Or split and think of the whole field, the gestalt.
Embrace response-ability.
Be aware that everything you do is your expression; it comes from you.
Ask more questions and become aware of the obvious.
What you dream, fantasize about, repeat deliberately to own it.
Learn meanings by relating foreground to background.
etc
Three Decades, Three Versions
I’ve come to see NLP’s evolution in three distinct phases.
NLP 1.0 emerged in the mid-1970s as a linguistic model. The Meta-Model gave us tools to challenge vague language and surface thinking. It was revolutionary because it was practical and teachable. But it was also incomplete.
NLP 2.0 arrived in the 1980s when Grinder and DeLozier introduced “new code” and Dilts added “logical levels.” The model expanded beyond therapy into modeling expertise itself. We gained sub-modalities, meta-programs, and time-lines. The toolkit grew richer, but something else happened too: the field fractured. By the late 1980s, NLP entered what I call its self-destruct mode. Five competing camps emerged. Lawsuits flew. The American NLP community collapsed under the weight of its own ego.
This is where the story gets interesting.
While NLP imploded in the United States, it thrived internationally. Conferences multiplied. Research expanded. By the 2010s, there was genuine momentum toward unity, symbolized by the NLP Leadership Summit. Then 2020 hit, and the pandemic shutdown devastated in-person training models worldwide.
The Third Evolution
NLP 3.0, which we now call Neuro-Semantics, emerged from recognizing what the earlier models missed: self-reflexive consciousness. This isn’t just semantic wordplay. It’s about understanding how our minds work at meta-levels, how frames govern our states, and how we can work with the structure of experience itself.
When I integrated Meta-States into classical NLP training back in 1997, I didn’t set out to create something new. I was solving a practical problem. The existing model couldn’t adequately address complex states like resilience, leadership, or self-esteem because it didn’t account for how we think about our thinking.
Neuro-Semantics extends the Meta-Model by incorporating distinctions from Alfred Korzybski that the original NLP developers overlooked. It provides a more complete model of how the mind actually functions. It enables us to work with hidden unconscious frames that drive behavior patterns.
What This Means for You
If you’re already trained in classical NLP, Neuro-Semantics offers something significant: a focus on meta-structure and a clearer understanding of how framing works. It’s not about abandoning what you know, but deepening it with tools that address the gaps.
If you’re new to this field, you face a choice. You can learn historical NLP, with all its myths and manipulations, or you can start with an advanced model that has continued developing and testing its effectiveness in real-world application.
The Larger Question
Will NLP survive the 2020s? Will it experience a resurgence, or will it fade like the Human Potential Movement that spawned it?
I can’t predict the future of the broader NLP community. What I do know is that the core insights remain powerful. The ability to model excellence, to understand how language shapes neurology, to work with the structure of subjective experience, these capabilities are more relevant now than ever.
At The Coaching Centre, we’ve committed to preserving what works: a clean, thorough presentation of Advanced NLP that continues building from the original premises while eliminating what doesn’t serve. We’re not interested in defending territory or winning arguments. We’re focused on one question: Does this help people live more fully?
That’s the standard that matters. Not whose certification you hold or which lineage you claim, but whether you can help another human being think more clearly, feel more authentically, and act more effectively.
The tools are here. The model continues evolving. The question isn’t whether NLP is relevant in 2025 and 2026. The question is whether you’re ready to engage with it at its most sophisticated level yet.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Imagine The Life You Deserve And Loving Every Minute Of It
This field is hidden when viewing the form
document.getElementById( “ak_js_8” ).setAttribute( “value”, ( new Date() ).getTime() );
